Notes of the

 

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY POLICY COUNCIL

February 26, 2004

 

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BOARD RE-CONVENES

 

David Sumler reported on the re-birth of the Information Technology Board (ITB).  After about 18 months of inactivity, it held its first meeting in December 2003.  It met again on Monday, February 23, 2004.  It is unclear what role the Ehrlich Administration is assigning to the ITB.  The new Chair of the ITB, Robert L. Wallace, presided.  He introduced the new CIO for the State, Ellis Kitchen.  

 

It was announced that there will be a “Summit of State Networks” organized by the Maryland Office of Information Technology on March 15 from 9-3.  For details, one should contact Richard Rose by e-mail.  Presentations will be made by representatives of UMATS, SAILOR, network.Maryland, and the Maryland Department of Transportation.

 

The Summit will be held at UMBC’s “South Campus” building.

 

There was discussion of inviting Robert Wallace and/or Ellis Kitchen to an ETPC meeting. It would be an opportunity to communicate ETPC’s agenda. 

 

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

 

There was a discussion of legislative matters. Jody Kallis suggested that the ETPC support the legislation making the Maryland Digital Library a program of the Maryland Higher Education Commission. (SB 615, HB 1167). There was a consensus that this would be a good idea.

 

Julie Hamlin wondered whether those present thought that MarylandOnline should take a similar course in getting legislative recognition of MOL. There was discussion but no consensus.

 

There was discussion of SB 503, which would create a pilot program for supplying laptops to all students in two middle schools—one in Baltimore and one in Montgomery County. The purpose of the pilot program is to test wireless networks in the public school setting. 

 

PAPPAS COMMISSION ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

 

David Sumler reported that the Pappas Commission Report had been issued. He circulated the Report.  He noted the following recommendations from the section titled “Harness Maryland’s Research and Development Assets”:

 

1. Establish a permanent State Chief Technology Officer

To ensure that the development of advanced technology business remains a high priority

within the Department of Business and Economic Development, the Governor should create a permanent State Chief Technology Officer within DBED, with direct report to the Secretary.

 

2. Increase utilization and effectiveness of Maryland Technology Councils

Establish a better working relationship with the Technology Councils across the State amongst themselves, State Agencies, and State Government.

 

3. Encourage entrepreneurial initiatives and technology transfer

The University System of Maryland should review, revise and clarify the regulations and practices relating to intellectual property (IP) ownership, indemnification, and other legal and administrative risk issues to ensure that the practices of the State of Maryland, the University System, and institutional leaders encourage technology transfer and entrepreneurialism. Furthermore, the University System should conduct an annual forum for private technology firms on ways universities could improve industry and university research partnerships, sponsored by the DBED, Technology Council of Maryland, the Greater Baltimore Technology Council, and TEDCO.

 

4. Support the State’s incubator network with capital and operating funds for best practices

The State should support and expand its existing business incubator network through increased capital and operating funding. This funding should be tied to the implementation of national best practices.

 

5. Allow State higher education institutions greater leeway under State personnel and procurement rules for activities that are not directly supported by State General Funds

To encourage public universities to attract more research dollars to Maryland, the Governor, with cooperation of the University System of Maryland and other institutions of higher education, should develop a legislative package to reform the state laws, rules and regulations concerning the expenditure associated with research at Maryland’s public universities but not funded by the state, specifically those sections governing procurement and personnel matters.

 

6. Increase State funding for academic research

The State should increase its support for pre-seed technology development via the TEDCO university technology development fund (UTDF), expand the Maryland Industrial Partnerships (MIPS) program funding, and create new multi-institutional centers of excellence targeted to developing world-class research focused on specific federal and private funding opportunities in areas of importance to the economic development of Maryland.

 

7. Encourage Maryland research consortia to compete for large federal funding opportunities

Develop a Maryland-based forum that enables consortia of universities, government labs and the private sector to more competitively respond to large-scale federal funding opportunities.

 

8. Create alternative financing vehicles to create more laboratory space at Maryland’s Universities

Maryland’s higher education institutions should work with the State to develop alternative capital construction financing models to construct additional laboratory (lab) space, acquire additional lab equipment, and expand university research parks by reforming the State of Maryland and Board of Public Works (BPW) regulations to encourage public/private partnerships, and support Congressional efforts to increase flexibility in federal real estate transactions.

 

9. Promote increased coordination at University and college tech transfer offices

The technology transfer offices of Maryland’s colleges and universities should expand their collaboration to promote cooperation, best practices and greater efficiencies, including exploring ways of sharing administrative functions. The technology transfer offices should also improve the role of advisory panels.

 

STATE PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

 

David reported that the MHEC would be re-writing the State Plan for Higher Education over the summer.  The effort would begin in earnest after the end of the legislative session and would be completed around October 1, 2004.  There would be an opportunity for the ETPC and other advisory groups to react to drafts of the Plan during the summer and early fall.  The ETPC should be considering issues it would like to see addressed in the Plan.

 

ROUNDTABLE

 

Julie Hamlin reported that MOL is stable and beginning to concentrate on marketing its services. It is beginning a teacher education initiative to offer the Associate of Arts in Teaching online. This will be a multi-institutional activity of the community colleges. 

 

Julie proposed that the ETPC re-new contacts with Delegate Barve.  It was decided that she, Richard Rose and David Sumler would try to meet with Del. Barve and give him a copy of the proposal for a “Digital Learning Act.”  Jody Kallis suggested it might be better to bring this up as part of the State Plan discussions; since the time in this legislative session for new bills and budget requests had passed.  There was agreement that the contact could not hurt.  So Julie agreed to try to arrange the meeting.

 

NEXT MEETING

 

The next meeting of the ETPC is scheduled for Thursday, March 25.  However, this may change depending on when a meeting can be scheduled with Robert Wallace, Chair of the ITB.  Tom Glaser is working on this. The meeting will probably be at Howard Community College, because Mr. Wallace’s offices are in Columbia.